TOD MAPS INDEX
HOW TO USE THE MAP DIRECTORY:
Map directory listings are hierarchically organized by (1) TOD neighborhood, (2) document title, (3) document section/chapter title, (4) document sub-header, and (5) image figure number and title.
Click on the TOD neighborhood name to open the list of available images. The entire document pertaining to the listed images is also available (next to PDF icons).
NOTE: Only labeled figures from documents are included in these listings. To view/download additional PDF documents or images related to the TOD neighborhoods and other projects, please visit the Projects or Neighborhoods pages. An interactive TOD Zoning Map is also available to view existing zoning and proposed TOD zoning side by side, in addition to the Honolulu Open Geospatial Data Portal where you can search for TOD and other datasets.
Aiea-Pearl City Neighborhood TOD Plan (adopted) – September 2014
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
B. LEEWARD COMMUNITY COLLEGE STATION AREA
Figure B-1: Leeward Community College Station Area Illustrative Plan
C. PEARL HIGHLANDS STATION AREA
Figure C-1: Pearl Highlands Station Area Illustrative Plan
D. PEARLRIDGE STATION AREA
Figure D-1: Pearlridge Station Area Illustrative Plan
PROJECT OVERVIEW & EXISTING CONDITIONS
A. BACKGROUND
Figure 1: Honolulu Rail Transit Project Alignment Map
Figure 2: Aiea–Pearl City Neighborhood TOD Plan Areas
B. WHAT IS TOD AND SMART GROWTH?
Figure 3: Primary Urban Center Development Plan Land Use Map
C. ONGOING AND PREVIOUS PLANS
Figure 4: Aiea–Pearl City Livable Communities Plan
Figure 5: Pearl Harbor Historic Trail Master Plan
Figure 6: Existing Land UsesD. PLANNING AREA OVERVIEW
Figure 7: Existing Zoning
Figure 8: TOD Issues and Opportunities
PLAN PRINCIPLES
Figure 9: Aiea–Pearl City Neighborhood TOD Planning Principles
PLAN OVERVIEW
Figure 10: Aiea–Pearl City Neighborhood TOD Plan Overview
LEEWARD COMMUNITY COLLEGE STATION AREA PLAN
Figure 11: Leeward Community College Station Area Illustrative Plan
A. OVERALL STRUCTURE
Figure 12: Leeward Community College Station Area Circulation Diagram
C. PARKS & OPEN SPACE
Figure C57: Proposed lower-density residential area adjacent to campus
D. URBAN FORM
Figure D59: Proposed Mixed Use Development and Open Spaces Mauka of the Main Campus Entrance
Figure 13: Leeward Community College Station Area – Existing Land Uses
Figure 14: Leeward Community College Station Area – Proposed Land Uses
E. LAND USE
Figure 15: Leeward Community College Station Area: Existing Conditions
Figure 16: Leeward Community College Station Area: Phase 1
F. PROTOTYPICAL PHASING
Figure 17: Leeward Community College Station Area: Phase 2
Figure 18: Leeward Community College Station Area: Phase 3
Figure 19: Leeward Community College Station Area: Phase 4
Figure 20: Leeward Community College Station Area – Recommended TOD Special District
G. DISTRICT BOUNDARIES
Figure 21: Leeward Community College Station Area – Existing Allowable Heights
Figure 22: Leeward Community College Station Area – Proposed Allowable Heights
PEARL HIGHLANDS STATION AREA PLAN
Figure 23: Pearl Highlands Station Area Illustrative Plan
A. OVERALL STRUCTURE
Figure 24: Pearl Highlands Station Area Circulation Diagram
C. PARKS & OPEN SPACE
Figure C79: Improvements and public access to the UH Urban Garden Center
D. URBAN FORM
Figure D81: The Creation of a new Main Street environment within Pearl Highlands Center
Figure 25: Pearl Highlands Station Area – Existing Land Uses
Figure 26: Pearl Highlands Station Area – Proposed Land Uses
E. LAND USE
Figure 27: Pearl Highlands Station Area: Existing Conditions
Figure 28: Pearl Highlands Station Area: Phase 1
F. PROTOTYPICAL PHASING
Figure 29: Pearl Highlands Station Area: Phase 2
Figure 30: Pearl Highlands Station Area: Phase 3
Figure 31: Pearl Highlands Station Area – Recommended TOD Special District
G. DISTRICT BOUNDARIES
Figure 32: Pearl Highlands Station Area – Existing Allowable Heights
Figure 33: Pearl Highlands Station Area – Proposed Allowable Heights
PEARLRIDGE STATION AREA PLAN
Figure 34: Pearlridge Station Area Illustrative Plan
A. OVERALL STRUCTURE
Figure 35: Pearlridge Station Area Circulation Diagram
D. URBAN FORM
Figure 36: Pearlridge Station Area – Existing Land Uses
Figure 37: Pearlridge Station Area – Proposed Land Uses
E. LAND USE
Figure 38: Pearlridge Station Area: Existing Conditions
Figure 39: Pearlridge Station Area: Phase 1
F. PROTOTYPICAL PHASING
Figure 40: Pearlridge Station Area: Phase 2
Figure 41: Pearlridge Station Area: Phase 3
Figure 42: Pearlridge Station Area: Phase 4
Figure 43: Pearlridge Station Area – Recommended TOD Special District
G. DISTRICT BOUNDARIES
Figure 44: Pearlridge Station Area – Existing Allowable Heights
Figure 45: Pearlridge Station Area – Proposed Allowable Heights
IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATIONS
H. IMPLEMENTATION PARTNERS
Figure 46: Leeward Community College Station Area – Implementation Partners
Figure 47: Pearl Highlands Station Area – Implementation Partners
Figure 48: Pearlridge Station Area – Implementation Partners
Airport Area TOD Plan (Public Review Draft) – March 2017
1.0 Introduction
1.1 Honolulu Rail Transit Project
Figure 1-1: Regional Location and Rail Transit Corridor
1.4 Planning Process & Participants
Figure 1-2: Region of Influence and Planning Areas
Figure 1-3: Planning and Community Involvement Process
2.0 Existing Conditions
2.1 Existing Plans and Ordinances
Figure 2-1: Existing Zoning Designations and Zoning Height Limitations
Figure 2-2: FAA Runway Protection Zone and Glideslope Height Limits, Lagoon Drive Station Area
2.2 Station Area Conditions
Figure 2-3: Existing Land Use
Figure 2-4: Land Ownership
Figure 2-5: Transit Stops and Locations
Figure 2-6: Sidewalk Inventory
Figure 2-7: Existing and Proposed Bike Facilities
Figure 2-8: Lagoon Drive Station Sea Level Rise Exposure
3.0 Plan Overview
3.1 Plan Overview
Figure 3-1: Overview Map3.2 Station Area Plan Overview
Figure 3-2: Area-Wide Existing and Proposed Circulation
4.0 Pearl Harbor Station Area
4.1 Vision and Overall Structure
Figure 4-1: Pearl Harbor Station Area Illustrative Plan
4.2 Connectivity and Circulation
Figure 4-2: Pearl Harbor Station Area Existing and Proposed Circulation
4.4 Land Use
Figure 4-3: Pearl Harbor Station Area Proposed Land Use / Zoning
4.5 Urban Form
Figure 4-4: Pearl Harbor Station Area Illustrative Massing
5.0 Airport Station Area
5.2 Connectivity and Circulation
Figure 5-1: Airport Station Area Illustrative Plan
Figure 5-2: Airport Station Area Existing and Proposed Circulation
5.3 Open Space and Parks
Figure 5-3: Airport Station Area Proposed Land Use / Zoning
5.5 Urban Form
Figure 5-4: Airport Station Area Illustrative Massing
6.0 Lagoon Drive Station Area
6.2 Connectivity and Circulation
Figure 6-1: Lagoon Drive Station Area Illustrative Plan
Figure 6-2: Lagoon Drive Station Area Existing and Proposed Circulation
6.4 Land Use
Figure 6-3: Lagoon Drive / Aolele Street Roundabout Concept
Figure 6-4: Lagoon Drive Station Area Proposed Land Use / Zoning
Figure 6-5: Lagoon Drive Station Area Illustrative MassingAla Moana Neighborhood TOD Plan (adopted) – August 2021
1. Executive Summary & Background
1.2 SITE BACKGROUND
Figure 1-1: Planning Area Context
Figure 1-2: Site Character
Figure 1-3: Existing Land Use
Figure 1-4: Community Facilities
Figure 1-5: Historic/Cultural Sites
Figure 1-6: Transit Network
Figure 1-7: Hydrology/Flood Zones
Figure 1-8: Hard/Soft Analysis
Figure 1-9: Redevelopment Opportunities
3. Development Framework
3.1 Overall Structure
Figure 3-1: Key Activity Nodes & Proposed Public Improvements
Figure 3-2: Yield Summary by Land Use
Figure 3-3: Yield Summary by Building Type
3.2 LAND USE
Figure 3-4: Planning Area
Figure 3-5: Subdistrict Designations
Figure 3-6: Proposed Land Use by Type & Intensity
3.3 CIRCULATION
Figure 3-7: Existing Roadway Hierarchy
Figure 3-8: Proposed Roadway Hierarchy
Figure 3-9: Existing Bike Network
Figure 3-10: Proposed Bicycle Network
Figure 3-11: Proposed Pedestrian Improvements
Figure 3-12: Proposed Parking & Servicing Concept
3.4 OPEN SPACE
Figure 3-13: Open Space Concept
Figure 3-14: Open Space Types3.5 URBAN DESIGN
Figure 3-15: Urban Design Concept
Figure 3-16: Viewshed From Ala Moana Park
Figure 3 17: Important View & Viewsheds
Figure 3-18: New Development Intensity Strategy
Figure 3-19: Street Wall Orientation
Figure 3-20: Shadow Study of Buildout Scenario
3.6 INFRASTRUCTURE
Figure 3-21: Wastewater System
Figure 3-22: Green Street Enhancements
4. Public Realm Improvement Concepts
4.1 CONCEPT
Figure 4-1: Featured Streetscape & Intersection Improvements
4.2 STREETSCAPE CONCEPTS
Figure 4-2: Kapiolani Boulevard Streetscape Enhancements
Figure 4 3: Kalakaua Avenue Streetscape Enhancements
Figure 4-4: Piikoi Street Streetscape Enhancements
Figure 4-5: Pensacola Street Streetscape Enhancements
Figure 4-6: Keeaumoku Street Streetscape Enhancements
Figure 4-7: Kona Street Streetscape Enhancements
Figure 4-8: Sheridan Street Streetscape Enhancements
Figure 4-9: Rycroft Street Streetscape Enhancements
Figure 4-10: Makaloa Street Streetscape Enhancements
4.3 INTERSECTION CONCEPTS
Figure 4-11: Ala Moana Boulevard & Atkinson Drive Intersection Improvements (Option 1)
Figure 4-12: Ala Moana Boulevard & Atkinson Drive Intersection Improvements (Option 2)
Figure 4-13: Ala Moana Boulevard & Piikoi Street Intersection Improvements
Figure 4-14: Kalakaua Avenue & King Street Intersection Improvements
Figure 4-15: Kona Street & Mahukona Street Intersection Improvements
Figure 4-16: Kapiolani Boulevard & Kalakaua Avenue Intersection Improvements
4.4 STATION CONNECTIVITY STRATEGY
Figure 4-17: Station Connectivity Strategy
Figure 4-18: View Showing Mauka-Makai Connections Through Ala Moana Center
Figure 4-19: View Showing Elevated Station Connection
Figure 4-20: Transit Plaza Concept: Ground / Concourse Lev
Figure 4-21: Section Through Kona Street, Looking Diamond Head
5. Zoning Recommendations
5.1 TOD SPECIAL DISTRICT
Figure 5-1: TOD & TIZ Precincts
5.2 ZONING DISTRICTS & USE
Figure 5-2: Proposed Zoning Map
5.3 BUILDING ENVELOPE STANDARDS
Figure 5-3: Proposed Far Zone Map
Figure 5-4; Proposed Building Height Zone Map
Figure 5-5: Proposed Build-To Lines
6. Implementation
6.2 PHASING
Figure 6-1: Phase 1-Creating a Transit Node
Figure 6-2: Phase 2-Developing a Backbone
Figure 6-3: Phase 3-Arterial Connections
Figure 6-4: Phase 4-Neighborhood ConnectionsDowntown Neighborhood TOD Plan (adopted) – July 2020
1. INTRODUCTION
1.2 Project Location and Boundaries
Figure 1-1: Regional Location and Rail Transit Corridor
Figure 1-2: Project Location1.3 Corridor Vision and Planning Principles
Figure 1-3: TOD Plan Concept
Figure 1-4: Illustrative View of Downtown, Looking Diamond Head Along Nimitz Highway at Maunakea Street2. LAND USE
2.1 Context
Figure 2-1: Existing Land Use
Chart 2-1: Existing Land Use, Percent by Acres
Figure 2-2: Potential Environmental Constraints
Figure 2-3: Historic Resources
2.2 Development Framework
Figure 2-4: Land Use Plan
Figure 2-5: Active Ground-Floor Frontage and Pedestrian-Oriented Design
Figure 2-6: Maximum Building Intensity (FAR)
Figure 2-7: Maximum Building Heights
Figure 2-8: Illustrative View of Iwilei District, Looking Ewa Toward Alakawa Street
3. MOBILITY
3.1 Existing Circulation Network and Operations
Chart 3-1: Overall Commute Mode Share, 2011
Figure 3-1: Street Network
Chart 3-2: Sidewalk Curb Length and Width, by Station, 2012
Figure 3-2: Downtown Station Location and Pedestrian Conditions
Figure 3-3: Chinatown Station Location and Pedestrian Conditions
Figure 3-4: Iwilei Station Location and Pedestrian Conditions
3.2 Multi-Modal Circulation Improvements
Figure 3-13: A Network Of New Streets Around The Iwilei Station
Figure 3-5: Multi-Modal Circulation Network
Figure 3-6: Existing and Proposed Bicycle Network
Figure 3-7: Proposed Exemption from Parking Minimum
Figure 3-8: Walkability Analysis
Chart 3-3: Projected Station Access Rates, by Mode
Figure 3-23: New Blocks Resulting From An Expanded Street Network In The Kapalama/Iwilei Station Areas4. URBAN DESIGN
Figure 4-1a: Birds-eye View Of Buildout Of The Downtown Station Areas
4.1 Station Area Character
Figure 4-1: Illustrative View of Downtown, Looking Makai from Nimitz Highway Toward Aloha Tower
Figure 4-2: Illustrative View of Chinataown and Nuuanu Stream, Looking Mauka from the Hotel Street Bridge
Figure 4-3: Illustrative View of Iwilei District, Looking Mauka Along Iwilei Road
4.2 Open Space and the Public Realm
Figure 4-7a: Overhead View Of Conceptual Buildout Of The Iwilei Station Area
Figure 4-4: Oepn Space and Public Realm
5. PUBLIC FACILITIES, SERVICES, AND INFRASTRUCTURE
5.1 Public/Quasi-Public Facilities and Services
Figure 5-1: Existing Public Facilities
A. APPENDIX
A1: Existing Maximum Building Intensity (FAR)
A2: Existing Maximum Building HeightsEast Kapolei Neighborhood TOD Plan (adopted) – October 2020
II. PROJECT OVERVIEW & EXISTING CONDITIONS
A. BACKGROUND/CONTEXT/EXISTING CONDITIONS
Figure 1: State Land Use Districts
Figure 2: Current ZoningIV. PLAN OVERVIEW
Figure 3: Proposed Rail Transit Station Area Land Use Plan
V. HONOULIULI RAIL TRANSIT STATION AREA PLAN
Figure 4: Honouliuli Rail Transit Station Area Land Use Plan
VI. KEONEʻAE RAIL STATION AREA PLAN
Figure 5: Keaoneae Rail Transit Station Area Land Use Plan
VII. KUALAKAʻI RAIL TRANSIT STATION AREA PLAN
Figure 6: Kualakai Rail Transit Station Area Land Use Plan
VIII. ZONING RECOMMENDATIONS
B. ZONING RECOMMENDATIONS
Figure 7: Proposed Height Limits
Figure 8: Parks Map
Figure 9: Keoneae Rail Transit Station Area Land Use Plan
Figure 10: Kualakai Rail Transit Station Area Land Use Plan
Figure 11: Proposed Height Limits & Maximum Floor Area Ratios
IX. PHASING AND IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY
A. PHASING SCENARIOS
Phasing Strategies, Phase 1 (for illustrative purposes only).
Phasing Strategies, Phase 2 (for illustrative purposes only).
Phasing Strategies, Phase 3 (for illustrative purposes only).
Phasing Strategies, Phase 4 (for illustrative purposes only).
Halawa Area TOD Plan (adopted) – October 2020
1. PLANNING BACKGROUND
1.1 The Halawa Area
Figure 1-1: Location on Oahu
Figure 1-2: Halawa Area Context
Figure 1-3: Existing Land Use
Figure 1-4: Zoning Designations
Figure 1-5: Community Facilities
Figure 1-6: Historic / Cultural Sites
Figure 1-7: Station Area Characteristics
Figure 1-8: Property Ownership (Public/Private)
Figure 1-9: Transit Network
Figure 1-10: Flood Zones1.2 Demographic Summary
Figure 1-11: Demographics of the Halawa Area
3. DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK
3.1 Overall Structure
Figure 3-1: Stadium Site Organization Concept
Figure 3-2: Scenario A: the Grid
Figure 3-3: Scenario B: the Crescent
Figure 3-4: Scenario C: Corridors
Figure 3-5: Other Development Sites
Figure 3-6: Illustrative Plan
Figure 3-7: Halawa Area TOD Plan Yield Summary
Figure 3-8: Land Use Distribution
Figure 3-9: Planning Area Sub-Districts
3.2 Urban Design Elements
Figure 3-10: Urban Design Elements
Figure 3-11: Important Views and Vistas
3.3 Connectivity
Figure 3-12: Vehicular Circulation
Figure 3-13: Pedestrian Connectivity
Figure 3-14: Proposed Bicycle Circulation
Figure 3-15: Stadium-Station Connection and Gathering Place
Figure 3-16: Kamehameha Hwy – Section of Potential Enhancements
Figure 3-17: Kamehameha Hwy (Mauka View) – TOD Vision
Figure 3-18: Salt Lake Blvd – Section of Potential Enhancements
Figure 3-19: Salt Lake Blvd (Ewa View) – TOD Vision
Figure 3-20: Residential Street – Section of Potential Enhancements
Figure 3-21: Typical Residential Street – TOD Vision
Figure 3-22: Stadium Loop Road – Section of Potential Enhancements
Figure 3-23: Stadium Loop Road (Ewa View) – TOD Vision
Figure 3-24: Proposed Parking Yields and Typologies
Figure 3-25: Conceptual Parking Yields
3.4 Open Space
Figure 3-26: Proposed Open Space Network (Public and Semi-Public Spaces)
Figure 3-27: Freeway Underpass Park
4. TOD ZONING
4.1 Halawa Area Special District
Figure 4-1: Proposed TOD Special District
4.2 Zoning Districts
Figure 4-2: Proposed Zoning And Maximum Far With Community Benefits
4.3 Building Envelope Standards
Figure 4-3: Building Maximum with Community Benefits
5. DEVELOPMENT IMPLEMENTATION
5.2 Infrastructure
Figure 5-1: Proposed Transportation Infrastructure
5.4 Development Phasing
Figure 5-2: Halawa Area TOD PhasingKalihi Neighborhood TOD Plan (adopted) – March 2017
1. INTRODUCTION
1.2 Project Location and Boundaries
Figure 1-1: Regional Location and Rail Transit Corridor
Figure 1-2: Project Location1.3 Corridor Vision and Planning Principles
Figure 1-3:TOD Plan Concept2. LAND USE
2.1 Context
Chart 2-1: Existing Land Use, Percent by Acres
Figure 2-1: Existing Land Use
Figure 2-2: Potential Environmental Constraints
Figure 2-3: Historic Resources
Figure 2-4: Land Use Plan
Figure 2-5: Active Ground-Floor Frontage and Pedestrian-Oriented Design
Figure 2-6: Maximum Building Intensity (FAR)
Figure 2-7: Maximum Building Height
Figure 2-22: View of the Kalihi corridor
Figure 2-8: Illustrative View, Looking Mauka From Puuhale Road
3. MOBILITY
3.1 Existing Circulation Network and Operations
Chart 3-1: Overall Commute Mode Share, 2011
Figure 3-1: Street Network
Chart 3-2: Sidewalk Curb Length and Width, by Station, 2012
Figure 3-2: Middle Street Station Location and Pedestrian Conditions
Figure 3-3: Kalihi Station Location and Pedestrian Conditions
Figure 3-4: Kapalama Station Location and Pedestrian Conditions
3.2 Multi-Modal Circulation Improvements
Figure 3-14: View of Kapalama Station Area Looking Makai
Figure 3-5: Multi-Modal Circulation Network
Figure 3-6: Existing and Proposed Bicycle Network
3.3 Projected Multi-Modal Transportation Conditions
Figure 3-7: Walkability Analysis
Chart 3-3: Projected Station Access Rates, by Mode
Figure 3-23: New Blocks Resulting From an Expanded Street Network in the Kapalama/Iwilei Station Areas4. URBAN DESIGN
4-1: Birds-eye View Showing Hypothetical Buildout of the Kalihi Station Areas
4.1 Station Area Character
4-3: Looking Ewa along Puuhale Road
Figure 4-1: Illustrative View of Dillingham Blvd Looking Ewa
Figure 4-2: Illustrative View of Dillingham Blvd Looking Diamond Head
Figure 4-3: Illustrative View of Kapalama Canal Looking Makai from Kohou Street
4.2 Open Space and the Public Realm
4-8: Illustrative buildout of Kapalama looking mauka
Figure 4-4: Open Space and Public Realm
5. PUBLIC FACILITIES, SERVICES, AND INFRASTRUCTURE
5.1 Public/Quasi-Public Facilities and Services
Figure 5-1: Existing Public Facilities
A. APPENDIX
Figure A2: Existing Maximum Building Intensity
Figure A3: Existing Maximum Building HeightsWaipahu Neighborhood TOD Plan (adopted) – April 2014
II. Project Overview and Existing Conditions
A. Background and Context
Figure 1: Proposed Station Locations
B. Farrington / Mokuola Land Use and Context
Figure 2: Farrington / Mokuola Existing Land Uses
C. Farrington / Leoku Land Use and Context
Figure 3: Farrington / Leoku Existing Land Uses
D. Existing Zoning Regulations
Figure 4: Existing Zoning Designations
E. Previous Plans and Studies
Figure 5: Farrington / Mokuola Draft Station Area Alternatives
Figure 6: Farrington / Leoku Draft Station Area Alternatives
IV. Farrington / Mokuola Station Area Plan
Figure 7: Farrington / Mokuola Overall Structure
A. Overall Structure
Figure 8: Farrington / Mokuola Connectivity Diagram
B. Connectivity and Circulation
Figure 9: Farrington / Mokuola Station Boulevard Concept and Station Area Diagram
Figure 10: Conceptual Illustration of Boulevard Concept at Farrington / Mokuola Station
Figure 11: Farrington Highway – Typical Non-Boulevard Condition (Dimensions and Conditions Vary By Location)
Figure 12: Farrington Highway – Boulevard Concept (Dimensions and Conditions Vary By Location)
Figure 13: Farrington / Mokuola Parks and Open Space Diagram
C. Parks and Open Space
Figure 14: Farrington / Mokuola Illustrative Plan
V. Farrington / Leoku Station Area Plan
Figure 15: Farrington / Leoku Overall Structure – Looking Mauka
A. Overall Structure
Figure 16: Farrington / Leoku Connectivity Diagram
B. Connectivity and Circulation
Figure 17: Farrington / Leoku Station Boulevard Concept and Station Area Diagram
Figure 18: Farrington / Leoku Parks and Open Space Diagram
C. Parks and Open Space
Figure 19: Farrington / Leoku Illustrative Plan
IV. Zoning Recommendations
Figure 20: TOD and TIZ Zoning Precincts
VII. Phasing and Implementation Strategy
Figure 21: Farrington / Mokuola Phasing Strategies – Looking Diamond Head
A. Phasing Strategy
Figure 22: Farrington / Leoku Phasing Strategies – Looking Mauka
F. Implementing Agencies
Figure 23: Implementing Agencies : Mokuola Area Flood Control, Water Improvements and Wastewater Improvements
Figure 24: Implementing Agencies : Streets and Circulation
Figure 25: Implementing Agencies : Parks and Open Space, Gateway and Place-Making Features, Front Yard and Sidewalk and Affordable Housing
Figure 26: Implementing Agencies : Financing IssuesFREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
A: The image figures in this index are all derived from neighborhood TOD plans. If you are searching for any other image, you will need to search the file and clip or save the desired image. You may also contact us for further assistance.
A: The neighborhood TOD plans are considered core material, and are also the most commonly referenced documents on this website. In the future, this index may be expanded to include other documents. If there is a particular document you would like to see included listed in this index, please contact us about the possibility.
Contact Us
Do you have a question or comment regarding Transit-Oriented Development?
